🔗 Share this article

In a notable legal reversal, a national review panel has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Ban

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to officially classify the circulating video. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to instruct platforms to geo-block the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was made public years after the assassination, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Response Following the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, X welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to defend free speech and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, the companies have been instructed to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in line with their own content policies.