🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but features several key changes:

• Every squad includes only eight human participants, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players award full XP, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for players looking for different ways to enjoy the title. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 fans are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Support

"People want real players. Avoid making the errors of your rivals," states a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," and someone else lists everything they believe to be broken in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds another. A response via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Concerns and Player Input

All that said, players have valid points to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of options in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major grievances is that a previous feature was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising halfway, according to forum feedback. Another describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.